Overview of Delivery Systems for the Administration of Contraceptives to Wildlife

S~ccesslcontraceplton n w d le reqres oorn Most RDS -se a powerea gLn ro ae ver e iner a oart or an elllcac~o~s an0 sale conlracepllve agenl an0 an o OOL lel conta n nq tne conlracepr ve proa-ct B 001, lel elf cac 0,s and sale melhoa ol ae ver ng lnal agent ro tne RDS are capable 61 !real ng many an mals rap0 y Boln anma. Remole de very systems ,RDS -mecnan ca aarts an0 o o b ~ els can oe oes qneo lo ae ver d lleren! aev ces capao e of aam n sler ng a s ng e oose lo an f o r m atons to provoe con~ro ea release of conlracep! ves ~nreslra nea an ma. ,s~al y oy means of a ba I SIC at a preaererm neo rate lor a q ven per800 The fo-r qenera projectile-can target specific animals and facilitate the administration of contraceptives on a body weight basis. Liquid, solid, and semisolid formulations can be delivered via RDS, and sometimes treatment costs can go down with this methodology. Disadvantages of RDS include the fact that many of them can be used only on larger animals and RDS' inherent complexity increases the probability of administration failure. c asses of conrro, ea re ease Systems mecnan ca pJmps, osmot c p-mps cnem ca y control ea syslems ana o flus onal systems are a sc~ssed Chemlca y control eo an0 o f l ~ s onal systerns compr~sed ol olooeqraaao e po ymers oller rne most promse lor s ng e-6ose. pro ongeo conlracepllve release tnal can oe remote y oe vered to wildlife